Why did the ideal of liberal nationalism fail in 19th century Germany Essay Example

Why did the ideal of liberal nationalism fail in 19th century Germany? Paper Despite all these successes the liberal nationalist ideal failed. Ultimately this was due to the militaristic conservatives had no interest in it; they were concerned with Weltpolitik (expansion of the empire). However on the path from the liberal heyday of the 1840s to the outbreak of the Great War the liberal cause was struck numerous blows. In 1840 one can see the first sign of the militaristic tendencies of the Germans by the Watch on the Rhine. This defensive fear and hostility to the other would ultimately cause the downfall of the liberal nationalists. In 1848 seemingly their strongest year due to the revolutions around Germany there was still a downside; their unsuccessful attempt to permanently alter the system of government and implement the policies listed in the second paragraph they showed that they could not overcome the ruling order without added help (either from Prussia or from a foreign power). These revolutions showed that the liberals would never receive this help for the other European powers wanted Germany to remain a power vacuum because its attributes (population growth, industrialised economy and positioning) made the Germans a threat to the balance of power. We will write a custom essay sample on Why did the ideal of liberal nationalism fail in 19th century Germany? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Why did the ideal of liberal nationalism fail in 19th century Germany? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Why did the ideal of liberal nationalism fail in 19th century Germany? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer From this point on the liberal nationalists stood for an appealing idea but one which was ineffective, I believe that they realised this disturbing fact and from this point on sought to compromise and attempt to influence the system in whatever way possible. This point is backed up by the signing of the Indemnity Bill in 1866 which was seen as a submission to the autocracy and as the liberals selling their souls to Bismarck but with hindsight it was the only solution at the time. The liberal nationalists would have realised that if you cant beat them, join them (or the equivalent German phrase). By signing this bill they were able to influence parts of the constitution that Bismarck made in 1871; some say that this constitution stunted liberalism but in many ways it was better to have parts of their ideal recognised than none of it (which would have happened had they persisted with their 1848 style). However their thought that this compromise should bring parts of liberalism (now on its own because nationalism was recognised by the formation of the Reich) to the nation was wrong. Over the next thirty years liberal policies were thrown to the wind; 1873s economic depression meant the end of free trade, 1878 meant the end of Wilhelm and the accession of a new militaristic Kaiser who would throughout the 1890s grew to dominate the political scene. From 1878 onwards there was no one in power who owed anything to the liberals or could gain anything by allying with them which meant that liberal policies were forgotten. It, in the form of an opposition to the government was replaced by socialism. Liberal nationalism did not die in the 20th century; the creation of the Weimar Republic showed that however it had no place in Germanys long term future. The liberals condemned themselves to this pitiful fate by not uniting in 1848 and although they had little choice in 1866, the acceptance of Bismarcks regime meant that their demise was unavoidable. The liberals could not be blamed for not realising that German nationalism would become increasingly aggressive although they did (via their liberal economic policies) put Prussia in a position of sufficient prosperity to be able to dominate the nation and allow them to drive Germany into the Great War.

How to Give a Great Presentation

How to Give a Great Presentation How to Give a Great Presentation Giving a presentation is, for many students, a stressful experience; even the most studious of us can find ourselves lost for words when faced with a roomful of expectant faces, gazing out in quiet anticipation. But being able to give an oral presentation is vital for your education and can help your career prospects. Rather than feeling nervous about it, you should therefore think of giving a talk as a chance to develop your communication and presentation skills. There are plenty of things you can do to make giving a presentation go smoothly too, including the following†¦ Practice, Practice, Practice! It’s an obvious place to start, but practicing your presentation will help make sure it goes perfectly on the day. Factors to consider include timing, the structure of your talk and the kind of questions your audience might ask. You should try reading your presentation out loud, as if to an audience. If you have a few willing friends, they could even listen, ask questions and give you feedback. Alternatively, you could also give your presentation to the mirror or record yourself and listen back afterwards. Be Prepared†¦ On the day before your presentation, try to get a good night’s rest. Likewise, on the day, make sure you eat healthily so you’ll have the energy required to engage with your audience. Moreover, try to turn up around fifteen minutes before your presentation is due to begin, or however long you need to settle in and set up any resources you plan to use, such as laptops, projectors or handouts. Be Confident Easier said than done sometimes, but even pretending to feel confident will help you communicate clearly while giving your presentation. Good tips include dressing smartly, making eye contact with your audience and not feeling like you have to apologize for yourself. If you need a moment to gather your thoughts at any point, stopping briefly to take a sip of water will allow you to think (and keep you hydrated). This can be especially helpful when answering audience questions. Be Heard! It’s important to make yourself heard when giving a presentation. This means addressing the entire audience (not just the first row), speaking at a steady pace (not rushing) and vocalizing clearly (not speaking into your chest). It’s a good idea to have notes to guide your presentation, but try not to just read them out loud, as this is often unengaging for an audience. Use Visual Aids These days, most presentations are accompanied by visual aids, such as hand outs and PowerPoint slideshows. These can be a great addition to your talk, but try not to rely on them too much.

Literary Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Literary - Research Paper Example Chopin’s sotry tells the readers about a husband’s suffocating grip on a woman’s life. In the story, the husband has not been presented in a direct negative light; rather a husband’s care and kindness for a wife ironically prove to be harmful for a wife. The irony lies in the fact that in a patriarchal society, no matter how much a husband tries to be kind like Mrs. Mallard’s husband in â€Å"Story of an Hour†, they are â€Å"the patriarchal annihilators of the women’s freedom† (Cunningham 52). Chopin does not tell her readers anything clearly about why the heroine of the story cannot explain her complacence and ecstasy at her husband’s death. Rather the author simply presents a small fragment of a woman’s life that provokes a reader to read the story as a sequel to his or her own real life. Obviously Chopin’s story will be endowed with a greater meaning, if Mrs. Mallard’s forbidden joy of independenc e is perceived in a real life setting. In a real life setting, Mrs. Mallard is like most other common women who, having no economic independence, cannot but depend on their husbands. Therefore, they are compelled to obey their husbands while suppressing their own desires (Stein 31; Deneau 211). Indeed, it is the patriarchal society that keeps them away from any self-supporting activities; that wants them to be loyal to their husband, and that punishes them and also endows the male counterparts with a power to reprimand and punish their wives in cases of the violation of the behavior codes that women are expected to follow. Also it is the patriarchal society that can confine women within the four walls of their husbands’ house. Nicole Smith refers to Mrs. Mallard’s confinement as following: â€Å"The world outside of her own bedroom is only minimally described, but the world inside of her mind is lively and well described by the narrator. The window outside of her room is alive and vibrant like her mind, while everything about her physically is cloistered† (1). In such a patriarchal setting, Mrs. Mallard is really lucky enough to get a husband like Brently who is kind and loving to her. So Mrs. Mallard know that she should not feel the joy at her husband’s possible death. Yet she cannot but feel â€Å"the ecstasy since her joy at the death of husband as an imposer of restriction is far more higher than her sorrow at the death of husband as a sympathizer† (Stein 28-9). In her story, Chopin deals with the same story of a woman’s lack of freedom in a round-about way. In contradiction to others’ expectation Mrs. Mallard senses the gush of complacent freedom hearing the news of her husband’s death. She feels sad. But concurrently she also feels the complacence at her oncoming freedom, as the narrator describes Mrs. Mallard’s joy in the following manner: â€Å"There was something coming to her and she wa s waiting for it, fearfully. What was it? She did not know; it was too subtle and elusive to name† (Chopin, â€Å"Story of an Hour†). At the news of Bentley’s death, she feels the prospect of living a life of enormous freedom and joy. But since in patriarchy a woman is not accustomed to express herself freely, she fears even to acknowledge the source of mirth and ecstasy. Though â€Å"she was striving to beat it back with her will† (Chopin, â€Å"the Story of an Hour†), she fails to do so. Indeed it is her self-realization and her acknowledgement that the death of her husband and the prospect of